The lawyers of Davidson Cahill Morrison LLP are expert courtroom advocates for a wide range of civil litigation matters including insurance law, medical malpractice, appeals, personal injury and municipal litigation.
We have offices located in Toronto, Huntsville and Bowmanville. We represent clients across the province.
We have lawyers who are certified as specialists in civil litigation by the Law Society of Ontario and ranked as the Best Lawyers in Canada in Insurance Law, Medical Negligence and Personal Injury Litigation.
Our dynamic insurance defence team specializes in subrogation, coverage opinions, appellate advocacy, statutory third parties, co-counsel work, and fire and property loss defence.
We have decades of experience advancing claims on behalf of persons seriously injury by medical negligence.
Given our extensive experience in courtroom advocacy, we have also developed significant expertise in conducting appeals on our own cases and as co-counsel for outside counsel.
Our personal injury practice includes representation for motor vehicle accidents, no-fault accident benefits, trip/slip and falls, product liability, and long-term disability denials.
We have years of experience in representing homeowners in claims against negligent builders and municipal inspectors.
We have lawyers who are certified specialists in civil litigation by the Law Society of Ontario.
Since 2018, we have had lawyers recognized by The Best Lawyers in Canada for work in the areas of Insurance Law, Medical Negligence and Personal Injury Litigation
Davidson Cahill Morrison LLP is pleased to announce that Paul Cahill will be a featured panelist at the upcoming webinar, “Defining a Winning Business Strategy for Your PI Firm” on March 25, 2026 at
On March 3, 2026, Hudson Chalmers, an associate at Davidson Cahill Morrison LLP, acted as a trial judge for the medical malpractice moot organized by Legate Injury Lawyers and Western Health Law Association.
In the recent decision of Austin v. MacFarlane, 2026 ONSC 463, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice addressed the ongoing tension between a vendor’s silence and the active concealment of property defects. For