Proven Courtroom Advocates · Offices in Toronto, Huntsville and Bowmanville

Author

Hudson Chalmers

Civil Litigation & Appellate Advocacy
Hudson is an associate at Davidson Cahill Morrison LLP. His practice includes personal injury and insurance litigation, with a special interest in medical malpractice. He takes pride in understanding both sides of legal disputes and applying that knowledge to the best advantage of his clients.
Ontario Courtroom

Rule 53.03 and Opposing Late-Filed Expert Reports

A March 2022 amendment quietly raised the bar for litigants who serve their expert reports late. Where the old rule granted leave almost as of course, the party at fault must now show a reasonable explanation and the absence of uncompensable prejudice or undue delay. Three years of Ontario rulings show the courts taking the change seriously, which makes opposing a late report a tactic well worth considering.

Read More »
Exterior of Osgoode Hall

Welcome Changes to the Rules of Civil Procedure

“Justice delayed is justice denied.” Few principles are repeated more often, yet civil cases in Ontario routinely take more than five years to reach trial. The Civil Rules Review, launched by the Attorney General and the Chief Justice, released its Phase 2 Consultation Paper in April 2025 with proposals to make civil proceedings faster, more affordable, and more accessible. A look at what the changes could mean for plaintiffs and defendants alike.

Read More »
Hudson Chalmers and Alex Wolfe

Hudson Chalmers Judges Western Law’s Medical Malpractice Moot Trial

On February 25, 2025, Hudson Chalmers volunteered as a judge at Western Law’s Medical Malpractice Moot Trial, organized by Legate Injury Lawyers and the Western Health Law Association. The hypothetical turned on whether an emergency physician met the standard of care in a delayed stroke diagnosis. He reflects on advocacy, expert evidence, and this year’s exceptionally strong students.

Read More »
CT Brain

Taking Advantage of Simplified Procedure in MVA Concussion Claims

For many concussion victims, issuing a motor vehicle claim under the Simplified Procedure of Rule 76 offers real advantages. This article explains how the 2019 changes removed jury trials, capped adverse costs, and raised the damages limit, and why that framework often suits the invisible injuries that make concussion cases so hard to prove.

Read More »